Measurement point: Stealth NYC, 32 Avenue of the Americas.
Published investigation. Updates run automatically.
01 / Network path
Network path.
Endpoint measurements / ICMP IPv4
Latency over time.
Successful endpoint RTT recordings from up to one hour before the event.
Enter time range
Times use the selected timezone; choices include recorded samples and intervals across the available chart.
Successful RTT recording Event interval
09 Nov 2026 20:00 – 09 Nov 2026 21:34 UTC. Hover or tap to inspect; drag across the chart to zoom. On touchscreens, first choose Select time range. Escape or Reset zoom restores the full range. Missing recordings are gaps; this is not an application availability or packet-loss chart.
Select a recording to explore nearby path observations.
View recorded values
Successful ICMP IPv4 RTT recordings.
Recorded at (UTC)
RTT
1.021 ms
0.972 ms
1.941 ms
1.529 ms
1.348 ms
1.021 ms
1.359 ms
1.523 ms
1.429 ms
1.016 ms
1.501 ms
16.604 ms
5.194 ms
1.000 ms
0.961 ms
17.401 ms
1.903 ms
0.963 ms
1.021 ms
0.961 ms
1.382 ms
1.446 ms
0.962 ms
0.975 ms
1.429 ms
0.952 ms
1.416 ms
1.381 ms
19.659 ms
1.080 ms
1.343 ms
0.962 ms
1.325 ms
1.104 ms
1.596 ms
1.104 ms
0.990 ms
1.365 ms
1.371 ms
1.354 ms
1.473 ms
1.091 ms
1.380 ms
1.435 ms
0.950 ms
1.405 ms
1.376 ms
1.064 ms
1.369 ms
1.059 ms
1.355 ms
1.011 ms
1.098 ms
1.440 ms
1.472 ms
2.263 ms
1.046 ms
1.030 ms
1.032 ms
1.405 ms
0.950 ms
1.418 ms
0.995 ms
1.506 ms
1.032 ms
1.425 ms
1.069 ms
1.372 ms
1.394 ms
0.995 ms
1.403 ms
0.958 ms
1.497 ms
0.967 ms
1.123 ms
0.975 ms
1.391 ms
1.000 ms
1.455 ms
1.412 ms
1.006 ms
0.939 ms
0.979 ms
1.421 ms
0.961 ms
0.973 ms
1.366 ms
1.371 ms
1.392 ms
1.432 ms
1.435 ms
1.569 ms
1.006 ms
1.366 ms
0.962 ms
1.372 ms
1.394 ms
0.969 ms
1.357 ms
1.071 ms
1.333 ms
1.044 ms
1.338 ms
1.410 ms
1.031 ms
1.010 ms
1.622 ms
1.369 ms
0.961 ms
1.410 ms
1.368 ms
1.512 ms
1.426 ms
1.404 ms
1.389 ms
1.359 ms
0.978 ms
1.377 ms
1.391 ms
1.375 ms
0.980 ms
4.317 ms
1.343 ms
10.809 ms
0.990 ms
1.513 ms
1.079 ms
1.048 ms
1.033 ms
3.216 ms
1.060 ms
10.345 ms
1.034 ms
0.973 ms
1.009 ms
0.959 ms
7.932 ms
1.363 ms
0.975 ms
1.033 ms
1.384 ms
1.427 ms
0.972 ms
1.388 ms
1.034 ms
0.967 ms
0.962 ms
1.425 ms
5.661 ms
1.028 ms
18.320 ms
1.390 ms
1.368 ms
1.421 ms
1.385 ms
0.990 ms
1.013 ms
1.010 ms
1.068 ms
1.364 ms
1.376 ms
1.356 ms
1.005 ms
1.397 ms
1.357 ms
1.406 ms
19.030 ms
0.966 ms
1.381 ms
1.032 ms
0.984 ms
1.395 ms
1.042 ms
1.380 ms
1.366 ms
1.550 ms
0.941 ms
8.038 ms
0.965 ms
1.383 ms
0.997 ms
0.995 ms
1.360 ms
0.924 ms
1.423 ms
1.200 ms
1.398 ms
1.025 ms
0.982 ms
1.369 ms
Network path / recorded observations
Network path observations.
13 observations
Choose a measurement type to see the closest of the available sampled observations to the selected chart point. Each probe is separate and may follow a different path.
Before
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 2
Recorded trace · destination not reached by this trace
RTT is the round trip to each responding hop, not the delay of the preceding link. TTL order may omit routers and does not prove direct links. A missing reply is not proof of packet loss. ASN labels are dated address associations; they do not establish the forwarding path or the operator at the event time. Up to three recorded traces per method and period are selected across the archive. Where no individual trace is available, a comparison may summarize a window; MTR observations aggregate multiple probes. Address aliases are independent across measurement types.
Same method / same recorded address
Compare the traces.
Compare one selected trace from before the event with one during it. Values are individual replies, not a statistical comparison.
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 1
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.127 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.132 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.184 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.182 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
Not recorded
1.365 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 2
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.125 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.123 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.191 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.189 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
6.228 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
11.644 ms
Same responder
TCP traceroute / 443 · Recorded address 1
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.415 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.216 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.177 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.225 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
1.841 ms
1.293 ms
Same responder
4
No reply
No reply
Not established
5
1.435 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
1.621 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Different responders
6
1.320 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
No reply
Not established
7
Not recorded
2.238 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
TCP traceroute / 443 · Recorded address 2
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.190 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.140 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.201 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.195 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
7.035 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
0.723 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Same responder
4
No reply
No reply
Not established
5
2.046 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
3.494 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Different responders
6
1.384 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
1.467 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Same responder
RTTs include the return path. Different responders, missing replies and independent probe flows limit what a change can localize. MTR snapshots remain separate in the replay.
Event timeline.
Latency anomaly. Times shown are UTC.
Event opened
UTC
Last event observation
UTC
02 / Assessment
Assessment.
Investigation stateInvestigating
Path assessment
Elevated latency observed.
Endpoint round-trip time was elevated during part of the event. The available path observations do not identify where the increase occurred.
What we observed
A sustained increase in measured round trip time was observed.
Recording counts describe collected measurements, not application availability or packet loss. Exact packet paths and the return path remain unverified.
Measurements at a glance.
Baseline RTT1.089 msUsual round trip before the event
Last recorded event RTT1.369 msLast successful event recording
Event p95 RTT9.307 ms95th percentile of successful recordings
Change from baseline+0.279 msLast event RTT compared with the baseline
Successful / expected recordings70 / 70Recorded endpoint samples during the event
RTT is round trip time; p95 describes the upper range of successful recordings. Endpoint measurements differ from individual trace replies and are not an uptime percentage.
Record sources and timestamps
Analysis updated
Unavailable
Public snapshot published
UTC
Public observation window
– UTC
Event and source timestamps are UTC. The latency chart uses its selected timezone. Page refresh times are separate from measurement timestamps.
03 / Method and limits
Method and limits.
How to interpret the sampled path and its limits
Corroborating the path.
Comparisons use matching destinations before and during the event. ICMP traces use echo probes. TCP/443 traces send SYN probes to port 443 only; they do not complete a TCP handshake or perform a TLS or HTTP exchange.
The Stealth gNMI interface verifies the active route-table choice and maps its primary next hop to the Stealth logical interface, configured attachment and, where applicable, the known LAG member set at each snapshot. Stable Stealth replies, together with mapped interface evidence showing no corresponding errors or sustained capacity pressure, reduce the likelihood of a Stealth forwarding issue. An 80% load warning warrants investigation; it does not prove congestion. Lower interval averages can conceal bursts or queue pressure. Optical readings assess the physical link, not congestion.
What remains unseen.
Probe reply handling can differ from packet forwarding. A slow intermediate reply that disappears at later hops does not locate a forwarding problem. A destination that does not respond to a trace is not thereby shown to be unavailable.
Stealth does not use ECMP in this monitored scope. The route snapshot does not identify which physical LAG member carried a particular independent probe, attest line-card forwarding at that packet instant, prove the exact application packet flow or observe the return path. RTT includes the return path, which may differ. No remote reverse traceroute is available. Tunnels and silent routers may hide parts of the path. Address registration alone does not establish the forwarding operator or responsibility.