Measurement point: Stealth NYC, 32 Avenue of the Americas.
Published investigation. Updates run automatically.
01 / Network path
Network path.
Endpoint measurements / ICMP IPv4
Latency over time.
Successful endpoint RTT recordings from up to one hour before and after the event. Points are sampled from the retained history.
Enter time range
Times use the selected timezone; choices include recorded samples and intervals across the available chart.
Successful RTT recording Event interval
03 Nov 2026 19:30 – 03 Nov 2026 23:14 UTC. Hover or tap to inspect; drag across the chart to zoom. On touchscreens, first choose Select time range. Escape or Reset zoom restores the full range. Missing recordings are gaps; this is not an application availability or packet-loss chart.
Select a recording to explore nearby path observations.
View recorded values
Successful ICMP IPv4 RTT recordings; displayed points are a sample of the retained records.
Recorded at (UTC)
RTT
11.558 ms
1.343 ms
1.354 ms
1.358 ms
6.338 ms
1.402 ms
5.380 ms
1.371 ms
6.165 ms
1.339 ms
8.445 ms
16.431 ms
1.342 ms
1.332 ms
1.402 ms
1.441 ms
1.382 ms
1.370 ms
1.371 ms
16.649 ms
1.399 ms
1.339 ms
1.336 ms
1.313 ms
13.912 ms
1.357 ms
1.377 ms
1.350 ms
7.554 ms
1.462 ms
1.629 ms
1.379 ms
1.388 ms
12.739 ms
1.639 ms
1.373 ms
1.332 ms
1.479 ms
1.513 ms
1.449 ms
1.365 ms
2.636 ms
1.479 ms
1.338 ms
1.378 ms
1.393 ms
1.316 ms
6.998 ms
1.368 ms
1.377 ms
1.343 ms
1.377 ms
1.661 ms
1.321 ms
12.040 ms
1.350 ms
1.435 ms
1.456 ms
7.393 ms
19.667 ms
1.339 ms
1.374 ms
1.347 ms
1.363 ms
1.368 ms
1.392 ms
1.382 ms
1.349 ms
1.335 ms
1.386 ms
1.354 ms
1.450 ms
1.315 ms
1.383 ms
1.353 ms
1.365 ms
1.335 ms
1.349 ms
1.403 ms
5.825 ms
1.365 ms
1.379 ms
1.407 ms
1.332 ms
1.338 ms
1.439 ms
1.389 ms
1.400 ms
1.452 ms
1.509 ms
1.374 ms
1.328 ms
1.429 ms
1.321 ms
1.367 ms
1.347 ms
1.343 ms
1.403 ms
1.370 ms
1.436 ms
1.377 ms
1.399 ms
1.391 ms
1.359 ms
1.394 ms
1.444 ms
1.338 ms
1.378 ms
1.336 ms
1.333 ms
1.351 ms
3.848 ms
1.361 ms
1.520 ms
1.359 ms
1.483 ms
1.422 ms
1.359 ms
1.351 ms
1.366 ms
1.411 ms
1.457 ms
1.357 ms
1.422 ms
4.073 ms
1.364 ms
1.458 ms
1.367 ms
4.865 ms
1.437 ms
17.268 ms
1.372 ms
4.723 ms
1.355 ms
1.383 ms
9.484 ms
1.328 ms
1.321 ms
20.034 ms
1.390 ms
1.336 ms
4.406 ms
2.149 ms
1.400 ms
19.275 ms
1.425 ms
1.362 ms
1.476 ms
1.402 ms
1.373 ms
6.347 ms
1.392 ms
1.354 ms
1.341 ms
1.392 ms
5.735 ms
19.010 ms
1.395 ms
1.445 ms
1.336 ms
1.353 ms
1.529 ms
1.407 ms
1.349 ms
1.411 ms
1.735 ms
8.992 ms
5.444 ms
1.360 ms
1.415 ms
1.359 ms
1.356 ms
1.348 ms
16.974 ms
1.396 ms
1.330 ms
1.336 ms
1.337 ms
1.395 ms
1.382 ms
1.349 ms
1.329 ms
1.371 ms
6.471 ms
1.414 ms
1.395 ms
1.343 ms
1.353 ms
1.349 ms
1.495 ms
1.384 ms
1.374 ms
1.398 ms
1.413 ms
1.405 ms
1.460 ms
1.455 ms
1.344 ms
1.346 ms
1.347 ms
1.495 ms
1.333 ms
1.365 ms
1.386 ms
12.479 ms
1.325 ms
1.355 ms
1.338 ms
11.578 ms
1.335 ms
1.451 ms
1.330 ms
1.427 ms
1.409 ms
1.460 ms
1.344 ms
4.666 ms
1.366 ms
1.352 ms
1.594 ms
8.358 ms
1.347 ms
1.375 ms
1.507 ms
1.528 ms
1.358 ms
1.336 ms
1.374 ms
1.359 ms
1.447 ms
1.331 ms
1.338 ms
1.422 ms
1.363 ms
1.364 ms
1.308 ms
1.358 ms
1.393 ms
1.400 ms
1.411 ms
1.329 ms
1.514 ms
1.389 ms
1.344 ms
1.394 ms
1.369 ms
1.351 ms
1.367 ms
1.385 ms
1.325 ms
1.349 ms
1.434 ms
1.319 ms
1.335 ms
1.325 ms
1.337 ms
1.376 ms
1.389 ms
1.365 ms
1.365 ms
1.339 ms
1.391 ms
1.517 ms
1.322 ms
1.342 ms
1.388 ms
1.343 ms
1.364 ms
1.363 ms
1.388 ms
1.331 ms
1.395 ms
1.327 ms
1.368 ms
1.388 ms
1.337 ms
1.401 ms
1.404 ms
1.487 ms
1.334 ms
1.443 ms
1.345 ms
1.441 ms
4.078 ms
1.422 ms
1.431 ms
1.387 ms
1.338 ms
1.434 ms
1.373 ms
1.326 ms
16.329 ms
1.335 ms
1.319 ms
1.372 ms
1.362 ms
1.344 ms
1.389 ms
1.359 ms
1.356 ms
1.486 ms
1.333 ms
1.681 ms
1.324 ms
1.357 ms
1.356 ms
1.403 ms
1.404 ms
1.404 ms
1.405 ms
1.470 ms
1.486 ms
1.335 ms
1.413 ms
1.372 ms
1.369 ms
1.432 ms
1.379 ms
4.458 ms
1.376 ms
1.316 ms
1.331 ms
1.361 ms
1.480 ms
1.376 ms
1.458 ms
1.353 ms
1.446 ms
1.402 ms
1.476 ms
1.787 ms
2.591 ms
1.384 ms
1.329 ms
1.374 ms
1.358 ms
1.338 ms
1.341 ms
1.377 ms
1.329 ms
1.495 ms
1.395 ms
1.479 ms
1.418 ms
1.367 ms
1.345 ms
1.398 ms
1.382 ms
1.340 ms
9.573 ms
1.344 ms
1.360 ms
1.401 ms
1.395 ms
1.383 ms
1.332 ms
1.378 ms
1.350 ms
1.451 ms
Network path / recorded observations
Network path observations.
17 observations
Choose a measurement type to see the closest of the available sampled observations to the selected chart point. Each probe is separate and may follow a different path.
Before
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 2
Recorded trace · destination not reached by this trace
RTT is the round trip to each responding hop, not the delay of the preceding link. TTL order may omit routers and does not prove direct links. A missing reply is not proof of packet loss. ASN labels are dated address associations; they do not establish the forwarding path or the operator at the event time. Up to three recorded traces per method and period are selected across the archive. Where no individual trace is available, a comparison may summarize a window; MTR observations aggregate multiple probes. Address aliases are independent across measurement types.
Same method / same recorded address
Compare the traces.
Compare one selected trace from before the event with one during it. Values are individual replies, not a statistical comparison.
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 1
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.183 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.114 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.190 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.206 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
1.412 ms
1.018 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Same responder
4
Not recorded
2.032 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
5
Not recorded
16.247 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
6
Not recorded
1.381 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 2
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.138 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.171 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.202 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.183 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
1.437 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
1.465 ms
Same responder
TCP traceroute / 443 · Recorded address 1
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.143 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.489 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.185 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.184 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
No reply
1.403 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
4
No reply
No reply
Not established
5
7.837 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
1.260 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Different responders
6
No reply
4.764 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
7
1.885 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not recorded
Not established
RTTs include the return path. Different responders, missing replies and independent probe flows limit what a change can localize. MTR snapshots remain separate in the replay.
Event timeline.
Latency anomaly. Times shown are UTC.
Event opened
UTC
Last event observation
UTC
Recovery observed
UTC
Recorded recovery describes this event, not current reachability.
02 / Assessment
Assessment.
Investigation stateRecovered
Path assessment
Elevated latency observed.
Endpoint round-trip time was elevated during part of the event. The available path observations do not identify where the increase occurred.
What we observed
A sustained increase in measured round trip time was observed.
Stored traces were compared using matching source and destination addresses.
Recording counts describe collected measurements, not application availability or packet loss. Exact packet paths and the return path remain unverified.
Measurements at a glance.
Baseline RTT1.366 msUsual round trip before the event
Last recorded event RTT1.411 msLast successful event recording
Event p95 RTT9.002 ms95th percentile of successful recordings
Change from baseline+0.045 msLast event RTT compared with the baseline
Successful / expected recordings210 / 210Recorded endpoint samples during the event
RTT is round trip time; p95 describes the upper range of successful recordings. Endpoint measurements differ from individual trace replies and are not an uptime percentage.
Record sources and timestamps
Analysis updated
UTC
Public snapshot published
UTC
Public observation window
– UTC
Event and source timestamps are UTC. The latency chart uses its selected timezone. Page refresh times are separate from measurement timestamps.
03 / Method and limits
Method and limits.
How to interpret the sampled path and its limits
Corroborating the path.
Comparisons use matching destinations before and during the event. ICMP traces use echo probes. TCP/443 traces send SYN probes to port 443 only; they do not complete a TCP handshake or perform a TLS or HTTP exchange.
The Stealth gNMI interface verifies the active route-table choice and maps its primary next hop to the Stealth logical interface, configured attachment and, where applicable, the known LAG member set at each snapshot. Stable Stealth replies, together with mapped interface evidence showing no corresponding errors or sustained capacity pressure, reduce the likelihood of a Stealth forwarding issue. An 80% load warning warrants investigation; it does not prove congestion. Lower interval averages can conceal bursts or queue pressure. Optical readings assess the physical link, not congestion.
What remains unseen.
Probe reply handling can differ from packet forwarding. A slow intermediate reply that disappears at later hops does not locate a forwarding problem. A destination that does not respond to a trace is not thereby shown to be unavailable.
Stealth does not use ECMP in this monitored scope. The route snapshot does not identify which physical LAG member carried a particular independent probe, attest line-card forwarding at that packet instant, prove the exact application packet flow or observe the return path. RTT includes the return path, which may differ. No remote reverse traceroute is available. Tunnels and silent routers may hide parts of the path. Address registration alone does not establish the forwarding operator or responsibility.