Measurement point: Stealth NYC, 32 Avenue of the Americas.
Published investigation. Updates run automatically.
01 / Network path
Network path.
Endpoint measurements / ICMP IPv4
Latency over time.
Successful endpoint RTT recordings from up to one hour before and after the event.
Enter time range
Times use the selected timezone; choices include recorded samples and intervals across the available chart.
Successful RTT recording Event interval
03 Nov 2026 01:00 – 03 Nov 2026 03:34 UTC. Hover or tap to inspect; drag across the chart to zoom. On touchscreens, first choose Select time range. Escape or Reset zoom restores the full range. Missing recordings are gaps; this is not an application availability or packet-loss chart.
Select a recording to explore nearby path observations.
View recorded values
Successful ICMP IPv4 RTT recordings.
Recorded at (UTC)
RTT
1.340 ms
1.389 ms
1.169 ms
1.313 ms
14.762 ms
1.360 ms
1.386 ms
1.341 ms
1.530 ms
1.128 ms
1.383 ms
1.349 ms
1.127 ms
1.177 ms
1.352 ms
1.329 ms
1.157 ms
1.195 ms
1.150 ms
1.169 ms
1.388 ms
1.163 ms
1.149 ms
1.141 ms
1.180 ms
1.453 ms
1.358 ms
1.116 ms
1.165 ms
1.173 ms
1.393 ms
2.514 ms
1.148 ms
1.150 ms
1.166 ms
1.129 ms
1.371 ms
1.167 ms
1.130 ms
1.370 ms
1.262 ms
1.172 ms
1.346 ms
1.160 ms
1.357 ms
1.379 ms
1.373 ms
1.127 ms
1.374 ms
1.360 ms
1.167 ms
1.531 ms
1.358 ms
1.913 ms
1.346 ms
1.338 ms
1.367 ms
1.365 ms
1.243 ms
1.152 ms
3.219 ms
10.039 ms
1.345 ms
1.343 ms
1.169 ms
13.404 ms
16.574 ms
1.381 ms
1.344 ms
1.287 ms
1.137 ms
1.354 ms
1.353 ms
1.345 ms
1.366 ms
1.157 ms
1.366 ms
1.186 ms
1.184 ms
1.378 ms
1.132 ms
1.359 ms
1.356 ms
1.359 ms
1.188 ms
1.227 ms
1.329 ms
1.118 ms
18.421 ms
1.167 ms
9.308 ms
1.194 ms
1.123 ms
1.365 ms
1.365 ms
1.488 ms
1.375 ms
1.369 ms
1.155 ms
1.182 ms
1.181 ms
1.343 ms
1.392 ms
1.168 ms
1.158 ms
1.448 ms
1.187 ms
1.359 ms
1.596 ms
1.363 ms
1.361 ms
2.123 ms
1.154 ms
1.415 ms
1.173 ms
1.161 ms
1.133 ms
1.145 ms
1.172 ms
1.402 ms
1.549 ms
18.829 ms
1.362 ms
1.148 ms
1.365 ms
1.131 ms
1.424 ms
1.172 ms
1.172 ms
1.390 ms
1.388 ms
1.369 ms
1.142 ms
7.406 ms
1.344 ms
1.423 ms
1.401 ms
1.237 ms
1.158 ms
7.262 ms
1.357 ms
1.143 ms
1.385 ms
16.555 ms
1.367 ms
1.381 ms
1.142 ms
1.399 ms
1.575 ms
8.511 ms
1.542 ms
1.360 ms
1.143 ms
1.243 ms
2.886 ms
1.356 ms
1.369 ms
11.032 ms
1.368 ms
1.182 ms
1.371 ms
1.368 ms
1.162 ms
1.385 ms
1.151 ms
1.173 ms
1.151 ms
1.129 ms
1.366 ms
1.240 ms
1.507 ms
1.343 ms
1.132 ms
1.149 ms
1.344 ms
1.474 ms
1.170 ms
1.148 ms
1.134 ms
1.330 ms
1.188 ms
1.353 ms
1.445 ms
1.347 ms
1.199 ms
1.389 ms
1.351 ms
1.325 ms
1.473 ms
1.355 ms
1.149 ms
1.146 ms
1.136 ms
1.368 ms
1.360 ms
1.782 ms
3.843 ms
1.382 ms
1.139 ms
1.360 ms
1.500 ms
1.356 ms
1.350 ms
18.220 ms
1.427 ms
1.170 ms
1.397 ms
1.200 ms
1.365 ms
1.146 ms
1.415 ms
1.157 ms
1.158 ms
1.382 ms
1.155 ms
1.345 ms
1.158 ms
1.388 ms
1.230 ms
1.130 ms
4.038 ms
1.342 ms
1.137 ms
12.606 ms
1.396 ms
1.151 ms
1.141 ms
2.251 ms
1.316 ms
1.469 ms
4.366 ms
19.275 ms
1.350 ms
1.379 ms
1.150 ms
1.338 ms
19.787 ms
1.369 ms
1.385 ms
1.412 ms
1.177 ms
1.358 ms
15.955 ms
1.186 ms
1.151 ms
1.368 ms
1.364 ms
3.456 ms
1.351 ms
1.220 ms
1.340 ms
1.293 ms
1.153 ms
1.409 ms
1.328 ms
1.349 ms
1.410 ms
1.385 ms
1.334 ms
1.397 ms
2.448 ms
1.147 ms
4.945 ms
1.349 ms
1.375 ms
1.185 ms
1.324 ms
1.243 ms
1.137 ms
1.241 ms
1.136 ms
1.423 ms
1.377 ms
1.135 ms
1.127 ms
1.170 ms
1.420 ms
1.371 ms
1.376 ms
1.120 ms
1.400 ms
1.459 ms
1.346 ms
1.243 ms
1.351 ms
1.341 ms
1.133 ms
1.164 ms
1.179 ms
1.146 ms
1.339 ms
1.368 ms
1.215 ms
1.122 ms
1.135 ms
1.335 ms
1.166 ms
6.372 ms
1.494 ms
1.379 ms
1.157 ms
1.178 ms
4.940 ms
1.142 ms
1.394 ms
1.168 ms
1.377 ms
1.166 ms
1.137 ms
Network path / recorded observations
Network path observations.
17 observations
Choose a measurement type to see the closest of the available sampled observations to the selected chart point. Each probe is separate and may follow a different path.
Before
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 1
Recorded trace · destination not reached by this trace
RTT is the round trip to each responding hop, not the delay of the preceding link. TTL order may omit routers and does not prove direct links. A missing reply is not proof of packet loss. ASN labels are dated address associations; they do not establish the forwarding path or the operator at the event time. Up to three recorded traces per method and period are selected across the archive. Where no individual trace is available, a comparison may summarize a window; MTR observations aggregate multiple probes. Address aliases are independent across measurement types.
Same method / same recorded address
Compare the traces.
Compare one selected trace from before the event with one during it. Values are individual replies, not a statistical comparison.
ICMP traceroute · Recorded address 2
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.128 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.110 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.644 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.198 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
0.864 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
1.245 ms
Same responder
TCP traceroute / 443 · Recorded address 1
Before: UTC · During: UTC
Same destination address and probe method. A matching TTL does not establish the same forwarding path.
TTL
Before RTT
During RTT
Responding address
1
0.148 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.196 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
2
0.184 msAS8002 · Stealth
0.177 msAS8002 · Stealth
Same responder
3
7.162 ms
1.390 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Same responder
4
No reply
No reply
Not established
5
1.941 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
11.191 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Different responders
6
No reply
1.432 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not established
7
2.119 msAS13335 · Cloudflare
Not recorded
Not established
RTTs include the return path. Different responders, missing replies and independent probe flows limit what a change can localize. MTR snapshots remain separate in the replay.
Event timeline.
Latency anomaly. Times shown are UTC.
Event opened
UTC
Last event observation
UTC
Recovery observed
UTC
Recorded recovery describes this event, not current reachability.
02 / Assessment
Assessment.
Investigation stateRecovered
Path assessment
Elevated latency observed.
Endpoint round-trip time was elevated during part of the event. The available path observations do not identify where the increase occurred.
What we observed
A sustained increase in measured round trip time was observed.
Stored traces were compared using matching source and destination addresses.
Recording counts describe collected measurements, not application availability or packet loss. Exact packet paths and the return path remain unverified.
Measurements at a glance.
Baseline RTT1.344 msUsual round trip before the event
Last recorded event RTT1.355 msLast successful event recording
Event p95 RTT8.014 ms95th percentile of successful recordings
Change from baseline+0.011 msLast event RTT compared with the baseline
Successful / expected recordings70 / 70Recorded endpoint samples during the event
RTT is round trip time; p95 describes the upper range of successful recordings. Endpoint measurements differ from individual trace replies and are not an uptime percentage.
Record sources and timestamps
Analysis updated
UTC
Public snapshot published
UTC
Public observation window
– UTC
Event and source timestamps are UTC. The latency chart uses its selected timezone. Page refresh times are separate from measurement timestamps.
03 / Method and limits
Method and limits.
How to interpret the sampled path and its limits
Corroborating the path.
Comparisons use matching destinations before and during the event. ICMP traces use echo probes. TCP/443 traces send SYN probes to port 443 only; they do not complete a TCP handshake or perform a TLS or HTTP exchange.
The Stealth gNMI interface verifies the active route-table choice and maps its primary next hop to the Stealth logical interface, configured attachment and, where applicable, the known LAG member set at each snapshot. Stable Stealth replies, together with mapped interface evidence showing no corresponding errors or sustained capacity pressure, reduce the likelihood of a Stealth forwarding issue. An 80% load warning warrants investigation; it does not prove congestion. Lower interval averages can conceal bursts or queue pressure. Optical readings assess the physical link, not congestion.
What remains unseen.
Probe reply handling can differ from packet forwarding. A slow intermediate reply that disappears at later hops does not locate a forwarding problem. A destination that does not respond to a trace is not thereby shown to be unavailable.
Stealth does not use ECMP in this monitored scope. The route snapshot does not identify which physical LAG member carried a particular independent probe, attest line-card forwarding at that packet instant, prove the exact application packet flow or observe the return path. RTT includes the return path, which may differ. No remote reverse traceroute is available. Tunnels and silent routers may hide parts of the path. Address registration alone does not establish the forwarding operator or responsibility.